The Future of Creative Technologies Conference ‘08

Some of my twitters relating to the Future of Creative Technologies-Technology workshop

I have a twitter stream, but have it protected but want to share only the #keywords. Maybe one day there will be a semiporus privacy setting, which would be nice, but in the meantime…

#foct08 JimHendler new ways of teaching? should we try to bring childrens attention to focus, or ask better questions on how best to teach 7 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#foct08, Jim Hendler “we love disruptive technology as long as it isnt disrupting us” 10 minutes ago from TwitterFox

@Eingang, but how you know the people you know is related to what you know, if you are trusted, have reputation and skill. 17 minutes ago from TwitterFox in reply to Eingang

@sleepydog made hires through meeting over twitter in his company #foct08 20 minutes ago from TwitterFox in reply to sleepydog

#foct08 content, methods of delivery , and validation, how to get quality 25 minutes ago from TwitterFox

I want something that retweets # even though the rest of my updates are protected, useful at conferences 32 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 social networking brings me into a group that I care about… 34 minutes ago from TwitterFox

FOCT08 technology is complicated, and has social and political ramifications 34 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 social networking brings me into a group that I care about… 35 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 social networking brings me into a group that I care about…(think by @sleepydog) 36 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08, management of privacy, privacy as a threat vs privacy as an rethink….. 38 minutes ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 cultural blocks on use of social technologies in schools. shortsighted? about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 crackle on the phone psychosocialhuman ‘feel’ of digital technology about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 @josiefraser knows who i am quoting at the technology workshop,but i am not…..but there are about 10twitters here…… about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 but the portion that arent are multiply disadvantaged about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 digital divides are present even in the creative industries, but what about wider community? Many are socially networked. about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 is it possible to make maps of exciting possibilities. about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

#FOCT08 creating packages of overviews of what exciting is happening in New Media, then introducing then to new areas of expertise. about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

what is the future Orson Welles “War of the World” moment #FOCT08 about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

Technology workshop: who is “real” who “virtual” where doe the “work” happen #FOCT08 about 1 hour ago from TwitterFox

The public stream: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23foct08

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

light-responsive objects using arduino

installation close up

Finished trialling my light-responsive objects that I developed  at the AA2A placement and the ISIS Arts mini-residency. My motivation was to make a work that encoded knowledge of natural systems, to create a gentle empathy in the viewer. Over time these devices have transformed themselves in my eyes into pets, or dependant creatures. Although simple, they are evocative,  they have metaphorical attachment  points for anthropomorphism.Some of the verbal reactions to the work are that they are “sweet”, “cute”, “life-like”.  So as well as a model system to learn about interaction, they are also a site of inquiry into human relationships with machines.
Continue reading ‘light-responsive objects using arduino’

Design Event 08 Newcastle

Have been visiting a few of the interesting events from DE08, Saturday Week, Tetris, a way of thinking about reusing cardboard to make furniture on a 10×10cm grid.

instructions

Next was a talk by Matt Pyke of Universal Everything, showing that it was possible to live in a smallish city and do interesting jobs for companies like Nokia, Nike, Audi. The tip seemed to be having a network of potential collaborators so that the team evolves and can change to suit the job.

As well as collaborators, there is also a pool of interesting ideas that Matt and colleagues find interesting, inspiring, which they document at www.everyoneforever.com.

3Hubs, an experiment

Last week was also an experiment in remote collaboration. On thursday, a group here in Newcastle met at ISIS to think about a complex topic “bio char“.

Pete Hindle and I had attended a keynote by Australian scientist Tim Flannery on bio char.

Tim Flannery

Image via Wikipedia

I had no idea what it was untill that stage, but described simply it is a way to make mineralised carbon that is resistant to degradation. How does that help us? Well, it doesen’t rot (or only very slowly), and so locks away carbon(which would become

2D representation of CO2

Image via Wikipedia

carbon dioxide,

methane etc), but the kicker is while you are making this, it is possible to extract oils/volatiles/tar that can be burnt to make electricity, or heat things.

So for me this seems an interesting way to power interactive artworks. There are two other hubs, one in Regina, Canada (Rachelle Viader Knowles) interested in Solar and the other in Bangalore, India  (Prayas Abhinav) interested in Biomass.

All of these fall under the banner of “powering new media artworks with locally relevant sustainable strategies”.

3hubsv1

Image by sctv via Flickr

This first stage event involved a modest nine people, and our thoughts are up at http://st.ation.in/wiki/projects:co-ordinated_ecodesign

So what did we discover, that it is fun to collaborate over timezones, that three way chats over skype work well (until the internet fell over), that doing it with others works.

Thanks to Pete, Helen, Ben, and Derick at my end for contributing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Convergent Conversations at the Informatics Forum, Edinburgh

Michael Kozicki and Richard Brown in conversation

Image by sctv via Flickr

Last Saturday, I attended a seminar at the informatics forum on art and science collaborations, or more specifically how the idea of dendrites has allowed artist/researcher Richard Brown and an engineer Professor Michael Kozicki (Arizona State University/Axon Technologies founder) to start talking.

So what is the discussion, the thread is dendrites that Richard Brown explores in his art work, and Michael Kozicki uses in developing disruptive technologies (like nanoscale valves, and massively bigger memory silicon chips).

It was a lively discussion, with that wariness evident, from the artist(you are going to steal my ideas, and not pay for them) and the industrialist(what is the use of art), why should i employ you?). There is that power play too, where the person that has the purse strings gets to call the shots. As a provocation, is there any other reason for artists to work in industry but to come up with novel ideas?

What are artists looking for? To influence technology? To critique it?

The talk was put on by the Informatics Forum and New Media Scotland.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Developing Sustainable Business Models in the Creative and Cultural Sectors

September the 23rd I attended a seminar/workshop put on by Newcastle University eBusiness, on Developing Sustainable Business Models in the Creative and Cultural Sectors(ESRC Project RES-185-31-0017.

It was the culmination of their research, illustrated through how known artists create a revenue stream for themselves, such as those in the Recording or Design areas. The audience had artists from the recording, DJing, Vjing and writing areas. I think I was the only one representing New Media or Fine Art(correct me if I am wrong). Reason for the underrepresentation I think is this gritty friction around fine art and money. Professor Feng Li’s(the primary investigator) standard phrase is “Imagine that you could be successful as an artist and incredibly rich”. At previous workshops, some of the participants had a visceral reaction to this, and I can understand it. However, the interviews have brought about some understanding of each side, the suit and the tshirt.

David Parrish was there to explain how they are not so incongruous. You can buy his book Tshirts and Suits, or download for free. One of the main take home points, was that a smart entrepreneur makes a device that makes money even when the inventer is asleep. The problem with the arts, is that it doesn’t make itself, and if something happens to you, the artist, the work stops.

A lot of the ideas explained in the taxonomy made by Danielly Netto could be described as making communitiy, making limited eddtions and merchandising your one offs. Radiohead’s strategies were discussed and the use of creative commons was also brought up (great!). The idea is to control your IP, and give away what you want.

This ties in nicely with something that was sent to me recently, about ideas, and whether they should be pursued. (from http://coudal.com/newsletter/recent.php)

Here are the questions, all equally important:

1. Will we be able to make money? We’re a business. We have mortgages and tuitions to pay. Plus, if we don’t make some cash once in a while, how will we feed our habit of continually screwing around?

2. When we’re done, will we be proud of the work we’ve done? Slaving for months on a project only to not want to show it to anyone when you’re finished just plain sucks. No amount of money can make that feel better.

3. Can we learn a little something new along the way? Executing the project has to make us smarter and help satisfy our curiosity, which we think is our greatest asset.

For an artist, not all of these are as important, we are not used to a work making money so concentrate more on being proud of the work and learning along the way, at least for the time being.

Which probably leads me back to Hans Abbing, and his book on Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts (Amsterdam University Press, 2002)….but I will leave it there today.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Overlapping loops of cause and consequence in developmental process

professor Linda Smith

Image by sctv via Flickr

Whilst I didn’t get to BarcampLondon last week, I was present at some fairly interesting conversations and seminars.

Monday was a talk by cognitive development talk by Professor Linda Smith(papers on website). She and her team are investigating how children develop language and object abstraction. Somewhere between 18 and 24 months, children start ‘getting’ certain things, like that if a horizontal block is turned, it can be made to fit in a vertical aperture. The 18month kids just don’t get it, keep bashing and bashing until they hand it back to their instructor, who demonstrates it easily. Even after this the child still does not get it.

What was interesting was the interrelatedness of learning vocabularies and identifying objects. Increasing attention to shape causes more rapid noun learning.

development is the product of continuous couplings of brain and body and world continuos coupleing

Image by sctv via Flickr

So what is happening, Proff Smith argues that there are cascades at work, a multicausal, wierd loop, with nontrivial spread process. That there is a broadly interconnected developmental ecosystem that is what gives us the power to identify and classify, and that it is tied into the physical presence of the object.

This was a great talk put on by the Cognition and Communication research lab CoCo at Northumbria University. It was interesting to see that as well as psychologists, there were also engineers and design lecturers present, a wide audience

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

A new community for newcastle geeks or pseudo-geeks

Quadrangle, Newcastle University

Image via Wikipedia

Whilst I didnt get to BarcampLondon last week, I was present at some fairly interesting conversations and seminars.

Monday night was the inaugural meeting, or pilot meeting of SuperMondaySomethings at the Beehive Research Center at Newcastle University. Whilst it has a strong focus on open source, I think the main thing is dialogue. The turnout was a pleasing 20 or so IT enthusiasts, with Pete Hindle, Derrick Welsh and I as the ‘digital artists’.

Looks to be fun, first Monday of the month, theres also a Googlegroup that is linked from the main site

Super Mondays is a strong and vibrant community of IT enthusiasts based in The North East of England. We meet up once a month for a range of IT user group meetings and some unstructured discussions.

There is no membership, no fees and no rules.the community is basically undefined! If you want to attend then just come along.

You can find out more here:

http://www.supermondays.org

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

processing as a quick video capture program on OSX

Processing.org has a nice video capture library that is suitable for quick videos for documentation, I am using it to capture some arduino experiments with the external isight camera

call and response

code follows….

Continue reading ‘processing as a quick video capture program on OSX’

compressed time

SInce leaving Singapore, time has become extremely compressed. I have visited SymbioticA, Creativity and Cognition Studios, Interactivation Lab, Centre for Social Robotics, Powerhouse Museum, Sydney Fish Markets, Australian Maritime Museum, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Creative Industries precinct at QUT,  been on ferries in Brisbane and Sydney, and a few planes too.

During this time I have been talking about my own practice in video and bio media, and how this fits into the wider aspects of  the biological arts and society.

I have got feedback from the audiences. It is interesting that the scientist heavy audience was focussed in finding a solution, or a way forward. The artist heavy audiences were more critical. Perhaps I had developed  the content of the talks between the 1st and 3rd talks.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]